Robert Kiyosaki's Rich Dad, Poor Dad is not a book about wealth in the showbiz sense, but rather an attempt to deconstruct the idea that money is a direct result of a degree, a job, and playing by the rules.Kiyosaki presents it as an educational story based on two characters: a "poor father" representing the traditional mentality (job security, salaries, degrees), and a "rich father" representing the asset-building mentality (owning businesses, investments, and systems that generate income). He does not claim that one was a saint and the other a devil, but rather puts them as two lenses: How do we see money? How do we see work? How do we see the future?
The central idea that the book repeats is that wealth is not the amount of income, but the amount of what you keep and what you build. One person may have a large salary, but his life is threatened because everything is based on a salary that stops if the work stops.Another might earn less, but own assets that generate a steady stream of income: a rental property, a small business, stocks or royalties, or any asset that produces a cash flow. This point flips the definition of success from "how much you earn" to "what you have that works for you." This is where the book's most famous phrase comes into play: "Make money work for you, instead of you working for money.
Kiyosaki relies on a simple but powerful distinction: Asset and Liability. An asset is what puts money in your pocket, and a liability is what takes money out of your pocket. With this lens, he reevaluates things that many see as signs of success: a fancy car or a big house can be a liability if they eat up income without producing a corresponding income.The goal is not to fight the house or the car, but to understand the "timing of the purchase": do you buy it after building assets to finance it, or do you buy it first and turn your whole life into chasing installments? Here the ethical-practical question becomes: do you choose an outward appearance of success, or do you choose a real financial structure for freedom?
From this point on, the book attacks the culture of "security" as it is commonly understood. The poor father in Kiyosaki's narrative says: "Go to school, get good grades, then a decent job, and you'll be fine."What if the job isn't enough? What if the world changes? What if your salary becomes a ceiling rather than a ladder?" The book is an early warning of the nature of our times: a shifting economy, changing jobs, and technology that makes less stability. Kiyosaki insists that financial education is more important than a degree alone: understanding financial statements, cash flow, investing, risk, and taxes.
One of the book's most controversial ideas is its stance on school. He does not attack education as a value, but argues that school teaches you how to be a good employee, not an "asset creator." It teaches you to succeed on a grading system, but rarely how to read a budget, how to distinguish between an asset and a liability, how to build a small business, or how to deal with taxes. In his view, this void causes many people to enter life with academic success but a financial deficit: salaries go to cover loans and expenses, without accumulating assets.
Fear and desire are the hidden drivers of our financial behavior. Fear pushes you to take a job you don't like just because it's "safe." Desire pushes you to increase your lifestyle as your salary increases: more purchases, more installments, and then back to fear again.This cycle is what many today call the "Rat Race": work to pay, pay to live, and live to work again. Kiyosaki presents it not as a dark theory, but as an invitation to break the cycle by building assets that minimize your dependence on salary.
He does not encourage gambling, but rather learning that minimizes risk: read, learn, experiment with small amounts, understand the market, and network. He reiterates that most people do not lose money because they are stupid, but because they are afraid to learn through experience, or because they prefer comfort over knowledge. He therefore advocates making failure "part of the curriculum": a small project that may fail but teaches you more than years of fear.
The book also provides insight on taxes and corporations: how businesses can use legal systems to minimize the tax burden through structures and corporations, while an employee often pays taxes before he catches his paycheck. This point is made to explain why the "rich" think differently: they build systems that protect and recycle money, not just income that passes from hand to bill. The idea is not to encourage fraud, but to understand the rules of the game: money does not move in a vacuum, but within laws.
On a psychological level, the book's most important contribution is its call to have the mindset of a decision-maker rather than a wait-and-see mentality."Kiyosaki suggests flipping the question around: instead of "I can't buy this," ask "How can I buy it?" Not because you will buy everything, but because the question opens up thinking: side project? simple asset? saleable skill? small investment? This shift from a sentence that closes a door to a question that opens a window is the essence of the "financial education" he wants to impart.
However, it is important to read the book with a critical eye: it offers strong and simple ideas, but it does not provide a one-size-fits-all map. The market is different from country to country, and the rules of investing are not identical. Some of the examples in the book seem more simplistic or anecdotal than step-by-step guidance. But the value of the book is not in being a step-by-step "investment guide", but in shifting the center of gravity from the outside to the inside: from waiting for a bigger salary to building assets, from chasing the appearance of success to building financial freedom, from thinking short to thinking structured, and from thinking short to thinking structurally.
In the end, Rich Dad, Poor Dad is like a quiet siren: You may live a respectable life as a successful employee, but if you don't understand money, you will remain at its mercy. You may not be rich today, but if you learn how to build small assets and repeat it intelligently, your relationship with work and time will be transformed.The profound message of the book is not "get rich quick," but "be financially aware so you don't live in captivity." It puts you in front of a simple but terrifying question: Is your life built around a paycheck, or around assets?
Comments